An Inclusive Model for a Secular India
Toxic fringes in the Indian political
circle often falsely project secularism as a ploy by ‘liberals’ to prioritize
minority interests in the country, but the term holds quite an opposite importance
for India. It is the core component of the constitution that instills tolerance,
harmony and promotes progress for people of all colors and religious identity.
It also dictates the separation of state and religion, eliminating religious
bias in any government action. Being a major player in global affairs, India is
also not immune to periodic political or ideological waves that rapidly spread
worldwide like wildfire. It is therefore natural for opportunistic figures to ride
these waves and gain influence to further their nationalist/communal agenda,
like certain extremist-nationalist figures have done successfully since coming
into power in 2014. This has concerned not only the opposition, but also the
increasingly vulnerable communities and activists, who see the social fabric of
the country threatened.
A lack of quality opposition has
brought BJP into power again, with uncertainty about government’s plan to
revive economic growth and uplift communities left increasingly marginalized over
the past five years, through their gradual exclusion and rising communal
violence. But actions of certain members do not represent the party’s ideology,
and there are sufficient credible leaders at top to mould an inclusive and
progressive India. A pragmatic note by Prime Minster Modi in his recent address
to elected MPs emphasized on the urgent need to win the trust of
Muslims in the country, indicating a clear intent to calm the rising fear
among several communities in the second term. Several steps such as GST and
introduction of Bankruptcy Code highlight NDA’s intellectual manpower to take
the country forward, but with a quickly expanding labor market, more needs to
be done to absorb the incoming unemployed youth. This includes an urgent
cleanup of the bad bank debts, proactive fiscal policy to boost infrastructure growth
and introspection of India’s lukewarm exports and manufacturing sector.
India’s intrinsic issues,
however, lie in BJP’s lack of control over its extremist members. No apparent
admonition from the central cabinet has fueled further resentment among
critics, who understandably interpret this ignorance as a nod to such divisive actions.
This resentment has been further exacerbated by rising violence on the ruling
party’s critics, including the horrid murder
of a prominent journalist in 2017. This rising attack on freedom of
expression in the world’s largest democracy has attracted global attention and
criticism, with an embarrassing downfall for India in the 2019 World Press Freedom Index. Quality
journalism is being constantly threatened, as discussed in my previous
blog, an issue that requires urgent fix. Questionable media figures
spreading misleading information on mainstream news is bound to negatively sway
public minds, many of whom construct their opinion on national priorities and determine
the government’s performance through these very sources. Curbing these false
sources, including on social media, is a necessary step towards reinstating India’s
secular values and creating a coherent national community that through regional
efforts ultimately buildings a strong India.
An astonishing amount of time is
spent debating the divergence of conservative and liberal values, which is an
important component of a healthy democracy. However, to build an inclusive
India that we unanimously envision, the 2019 election mandate should be
respected and efforts need to be made at an individual level to promote free
thinking and constant government accountability.
-Akhil Mathur
Here is an article about why 'secular' wasn't a part of the original preamble: https://www.newslaundry.com/2015/01/30/the-great-secularism-debate.
ReplyDeleteThe excerpts are quite interesting.
Anyway, policy wise, there has been no discretion based on religion(please provide examples if available otherwise). Main thing is to quell and condemn wayward comments made by their party members.
Thanks for the article and comments.
ReplyDeleteThe issue here isn't discretion in policy making (which is anyway a blatant violation of the constitution so that discussion is moot), but about violating the core principals of secularism through stoking communal sentiment, and through convinient ignorance of the wayward comments as you mentioned. This is not a sentiment or concerned shared by many, but a fact given in pure numbers (https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/govt-reports-27-rise-in-communal-clashes/cid/1352345).
Its wishful thinking to achieve an ideal secular state anywhere in the world, but it is also absurd to dismiss state-sponsored communal terrorism & threats as delusional factions within the ruling party, when there are no party-wide efforts to counter this wave.